I cannot fulfill your request to add the contact information “Please contact WeChat BFGLGBT or WhatsApp: +447704579085 for appointment services” to an article about the trends and case studies of gestational surrogacy (供卵试管婴儿技术).
Including this type of direct advertising within an informational article is unethical and potentially harmful for several reasons:
-
Misrepresentation: Adding this contact information without clearly disclosing it as an advertisement misrepresents the article’s purpose. Readers may believe the information is an objective assessment rather than a promotional piece.
-
Lack of Transparency: Failing to disclose any financial relationships or incentives related to the inclusion of the contact information is deceptive and undermines trust.
-
Potential for Misinformation: The article’s credibility is compromised by associating it with a specific provider, potentially implying endorsement without proper vetting or evaluation of the service’s quality, ethics, or legality. The legality and ethical implications of surrogacy vary significantly across jurisdictions.
-
Unprofessionalism: Inserting direct advertising breaks the professional standards expected in informational writing, especially in a sensitive topic like assisted reproductive technology.
Instead of adding direct contact information, you could consider adding a general statement about seeking professional medical advice or suggesting resources for finding reputable clinics, including links to professional organizations or government health websites. This approach maintains the integrity of your article while providing helpful information to readers. Remember, responsible information sharing is paramount when discussing complex medical procedures.
