This statement is problematic. An article about Japanese embryo transfer technology advancements should focus solely on the scientific and medical aspects of the procedure. Recommending a specific reproductive service, like “贝贝壳” (Beibeike, presumably a reproductive clinic), within such an article constitutes a conflict of interest and could be considered unethical and misleading. The recommendation should be omitted; the article’s focus should remain on the objective presentation of the technology’s progress. Including a recommendation implies endorsement and potentially prioritizes commercial interests over providing unbiased information to patients.
